From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephane Eranian Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:04:06 +0000 Subject: Re: 2.6.18 perfmon new code base + libpfm + pfmon Message-Id: <20060928140406.GF18245@frankl.hpl.hp.com> List-Id: References: <20060926143420.GF14550@frankl.hpl.hp.com> <20060926220951.39bd344f.akpm@osdl.org> <20060927224832.GA17883@frankl.hpl.hp.com> <20060928134126.GA14635@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20060928134126.GA14635@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chritoph, On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:41:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > this completly leaves out my comments, which you also seemed to ignore before > :) It is true I forgot to list your comments in the summary I sent out yesterday. However rest assured that I took them into account. If you noticed in my annoucement for 2.6.18, I have removed the perfmon KAPI interface, for instance. As for the UUID to string conversion, this was also pointed out by Andrew and it is work-in-progress. So here is the additional feedback I will put in the summary: [hch]: remove perfmon kernel-level API (perfmon_kapi.c), it is not justified - done [hch]: use strings insead of UUID - work in progress In general, I do listen to comments. The summary of changes is a good proof of that, I think. Thanks. -- -Stephane