From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:37:43 +0000 Subject: Re: 2.6.20 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon Message-Id: <20070214103743.3cb1c39c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <20070213184839.GC10031@frankl.hpl.hp.com> <20070213140533.a5ca27ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070214182932.GG11681@frankl.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20070214182932.GG11681@frankl.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: eranian@hpl.hp.com Cc: perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:29:32 -0800 Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:05:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:48:39 -0800 Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > I have released another version of the perfmon new code base package. > > > > Can we have a bug push to get this merged up please? > > Could you please indicate the procedure to do this? re-post the patches for review-and-possible-integration, as you did last time, I guess. > Do you "just" need a patch against your latest -mm tree? You should only raise patches against -mm is there's a special need to do that (usually: they're against something which is only in -mm). Patches against 2.6.21-rc1 should suit.