From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 19:19:45 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr
Message-Id: <20070508121945.3e8d29c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20070508152315.26329.8428.64771@attica.americas.sgi.com>
	<617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A01719A90@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A01719A90@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: John Keller <jpk@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steiner@sgi.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:03:20 -0700
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:

> +#ifndef is_affinity_mask_valid
> +#define is_affinity_mask_valid() 1
> +#endif
> +
>  int no_irq_affinity;
>  static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>  				   unsigned long count, void *data)
> @@ -42,6 +46,9 @@ static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struc
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	if (!is_affinity_mask_valid(new_value))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> This results in a warning:
> kernel/irq/proc.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function `is_affinity_mask_valid'
> 

It had a dopey little bug:


diff -puN kernel/irq/proc.c~sn-validate-smp_affinity-mask-on-intr-redirect-fix kernel/irq/proc.c
--- a/kernel/irq/proc.c~sn-validate-smp_affinity-mask-on-intr-redirect-fix
+++ a/kernel/irq/proc.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int irq_affinity_read_proc(char *
 }
 
 #ifndef is_affinity_mask_valid
-#define is_affinity_mask_valid() 1
+#define is_affinity_mask_valid(val) 1
 #endif
 
 int no_irq_affinity;
_