From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Chinner Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:53:41 +0000 Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385 Message-Id: <20070531005341.GF85884050@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20070530044448.GK86004887@sgi.com> <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A019298C6@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A019298C6@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: David Chinner , Andrew Morton , lkml , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Hmmm - I wonder if my tree is screwed up in some weird way. I'm seeing link > > warnings as well: > > > > WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .sdata after 'root_mountflags' (at offset 0x38) > > I thought that I'd got the section mis-match warnings down to > just one (and that was in ACPI code, so I sent a patch to Len > for it). > > Are you building from defconfig, or one of the standard ones? sn2defconfig + kernel debug option plus xfs options. > But I've had other complaints that these Section mismatch warnings > are still showing up in kernels built from the "standard" config > files (arch/ia64/configs/*) ... which I'm not seeing. So I'm more > than a little confused about this. > > These errors are unlikely to be related to the strace bug that > you've reported. I'll try to pound on this some more when I'm > back on the same continent as my test machines. Ok - no real hurry - they don't appear to be causing me any problems except build noise.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group