public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove unused TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (take 2)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:42:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070730174209.GA26366@frankl.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070730102115.cac237ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew,

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:30:34 -0700 Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> 
> > This following patch removes the TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME flag for thread_info. It is unused
> > on all but the IA-64 architecture. This is take 2 of this patch. In this version,
> > The definition is removed but no re-numbering of the TIF flags is done to minimize
> > the possibility of errors and reduce the size of the patch.
> > 
> > For IA-64, we ran out of low-order bits (first 7 bits). Adding a bit for perfmon
> > would cause important code rescheduling changes in the kernel entry/exit path. Instead,
> > we replace TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME with TIF_PERFMON_WORK. This way we get very close to what the
> > new perfmon code base is doing.
> 
> This has been (painfully) maintained in -mm for quite a long time.  I've
> been waiting for everyone else to merge their stuff so I can get it in
> without disrupting them.  This has now happened.
> 
> I think it'd be better to merge the larger patch - it's a bit tidier and
> more tested, OK?
> 
I appreciate your effort and understand your pain at maintaining this kind
of patch. It seems that neither you or myself have received any complaints
on this patch so far, so I am fine with you using the older version instead.

Thanks.

--
-Stephane

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-22 12:47 is TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME used? Stephane Eranian
2007-05-22 16:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22 16:07   ` Stephane Eranian
2007-05-22 16:15     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22 22:51       ` Stephane Eranian
2007-05-22 23:02         ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-23  9:57           ` [PATCH] remove unused TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME flag Stephane Eranian
2007-07-30  9:30             ` [PATCH] remove unused TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (take 2) Stephane Eranian
2007-07-30 17:21               ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-30 17:42                 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070730174209.GA26366@frankl.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox