From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russ Anderson Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:50:25 +0000 Subject: Re: Tiger oops in ia64_sal_physical_id_info (was [RFC] regression:113134fcbca83619be4c68d0ca66db6093 Message-Id: <20080227165025.GB1908@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <200802251027.15107.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200802251027.15107.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:34:19PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > > SAL 2.9: SGI SN2 version 1.30 > > I wouldn't expect SAL 2.9 to implement a call defined in SAL 3.2, > unless I'm seriously misunderstanding something? The answer is the 2.9 value is hardcoded in the Altix prom and was not updated to 3.2 even though the prom supports SAL 3.2. -- Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com