Re: Tiger oops in ia64_sal_physical_id_info (was [RFC] regression:113134fcbca83619be4c68d0ca66db6093

Russ Anderson
2008-02-27T16:50:25Z

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:34:19PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > SAL 2.9: SGI SN2 version 1.30
>
> I wouldn't expect SAL 2.9 to implement a call defined in SAL 3.2,
> unless I'm seriously misunderstanding something?

The answer is the 2.9 value is hardcoded in the Altix prom and
was not updated to 3.2 even though the prom supports SAL 3.2.

--
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com