From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:16:49 +0000 Subject: Re: larger default page sizes... Message-Id: <20080325.171649.223175755.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <18408.59112.945786.488350@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080325.163240.102401706.davem@davemloft.net> <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843ECE9E2CA@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843ECE9E2CA@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: paulus@samba.org, clameter@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org From: "Luck, Tony" Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:49:23 -0700 > Making an application use huge pages as heap may be simple > (just link with a different library to provide with a different > version of malloc()) ... code, stack, mmap'd files are all > a lot harder to do transparently. The kernel should be able to do this transparently, at the very least for the anonymous page case. It should also be able to handle just fine chips that provide multiple page size support, as many do.