From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:31:46 +0000 Subject: Re: larger default page sizes... Message-Id: <20080325.173146.238342309.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <87tziu5q37.wl%peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> <20080325.164927.249210766.davem@davemloft.net> <87od925o15.wl%peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> In-Reply-To: <87od925o15.wl%peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au Cc: clameter@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au From: Peter Chubb Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:25:58 +1100 > That depends on the access pattern. Absolutely. FWIW, I bet it helps enormously for gcc which, even for small compiles, swims around chaotically in an 8MB pool of GC'd memory.