Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING

Oleg Nesterov
2008-04-09T16:22:06Z

On 04/09, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> One of the supposed advantages of TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in the first
> place, iirc, was that it allowed us to return a result code other than
> -EINTR as _well_ as restoring the signal mask.

Agreed, good point. ERESTART_ is not that flexible.

Somehow I assumed we will never need something "special" here, this is
not very clever.

Thanks to all!

Oleg.