From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:00:50 +0000 Subject: Re: + Message-Id: <20080401100050.009cec7b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <200803282348.m2SNmleP016847@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <200804010957.16459.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200804010957.16459.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: davem@davemloft.net, greg@kroah.com, m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:57:15 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Friday 28 March 2008 05:48:47 pm akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > > The patch titled > > revert gregkh-pci-pci-x86-use-generic-pci_enable_resources > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > revert-gregkh-pci-pci-x86-use-generic-pci_enable_resources.patch > > OK, I'm not sure where we are with this. Ben listed arches where > the generic pci_enable_resources() should be safe: x86, alpha, and > powerpc. I think we should also include ia64, since I work on that. > > If there's no objection to those arches, how should we move forward? > Since Andrew put in "revert gregkh-pci" patches rather than just > dropping things, I assume the original patches are in Greg KH's tree. > > Can we just drop the "revert gregkh" patches for x86, alpha, powerpc, > and ia64? So powerpc is OK but ppc might not be?