From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:10:44 +0000 Subject: Re: + Message-Id: <20080414221044.GA3684@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <200803282348.m2SNmleP016847@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <1207082276.10388.224.camel@pasglop> <20080402051554.GA21714@kroah.com> <200804020843.02402.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200804020843.02402.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , Kyle McMartin On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:43:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tuesday 01 April 2008 11:15:54 pm Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:37:56AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 09:57 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > Can we just drop the "revert gregkh" patches for x86, alpha, powerpc, > > > > and ia64? > > > > > > Considering that the generic is equivalent to what I have today on > > > powerpc, I'm fine with it. > > > > Ok, so what ones should I keep in my tree? > > > > Bjorn, any help? > > I think we should keep x86, alpha, powerpc, ppc, and ia64. > > Kyle previously acked it for parisc, so maybe he can speak > up about whether to keep it there. Ok, I've kept: x86 alpha powerpc ppc parisc ia64 and dropped: arm cris frv mips mn10300 sh sparc64 v850 xtensa from my tree. If anything further needs to be changed, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h