From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 23:19:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] - IA64 machvec support for UV
Message-Id: <20080507231940.GE5609@ldl.fc.hp.com>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20080506201857.GA4830@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080506201857.GA4830@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

* Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:44:28PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > * Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>:
> > >  
> > > +config IA64_SGI_UV`
> > > +	bool "SGI-UV`"
> > > +	select NUMA
> > > +	select ACPI_NUMA
> > > +	select SWIOTLB
> > > +	help
> > > +	  Selecting this option will optimize the kernel for use on UV based
> > > +	  systems, but the resulting kernel binary will not run on other
> >                    ^^^
> > 
> > Should that be "and" instead of "but" ?
> > 
> 
> Yes. Unfortunately, I cloned existing text that describes the
> SN2 option using the same "but the resulting...".
> 
> If there are no other problems with this patch, let's apply it
> as posted.  I'll submit a cleanup patch to fix the text in both
> places.
> 
> Does that work???

I've no problems with this patch series, but then again, I don't
think it's my ACK that you need. ;)

/ac