From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: kernel unaligned accesses on IA64 in IDE
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:49:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080822214914.GA8609@gollum.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080822213812.GC11781@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:38:12PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 22.08.2008 [22:54:31 +0200], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:36:06PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > > How about long instead of int. int leaves us with the possibility that
> > > > something else will expect 8 byte alignment.
> > >
> > > How about this?
> > >
> > > Align __cmd to ward off kernel unaligned access consoles messages on
> > > ia64 (and perhaps make an almost imperceptible performance improvement
> > > on other architectures that can handle unaligned access, but do so
> > > more slowly than aligned accesses).
> >
> > By the way, i've been wondering, this unaligned access breaking should have
> > happened earlier, how did we miss that? Nish, Robin, can you see that in some
> > older logs?
>
> I replied about this in a separate sub-thread, but you may not have been
> on the direct Cc (though linux-ide should have been).
>
> This all began because I noticed one of my automated test machines had
> not successfully booted a kernel in some time. I investigated via
> bisection and found that CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y was broken on my IA64 box.
> With Tony and Peter Z's help, that bug was resolved, but then with the
> console working, I noticed these unaligned accesses. Sorry if it seemed
> like, from my posting, they were a regression, I did not mean to give
> that impression.
>
> They may have been there for some time, but I don't have any logs from
> kernels before 2.6.27-rc3, because of the CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y breakage
> (which was being set by default for this box). I could go back and try
> older kernels, if you'd like, but it would take some time.
Thanks for clarifying but it's not needed anymore since we know about the
problem now. I was simply wondering why similar reports didn't appear earlier
since the code that causes it is not that new - I guess there aren't that many
ia64 machines using ide-cd from a recent kernel out there :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-22 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 22:56 kernel unaligned accesses on IA64 in IDE Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-20 1:39 ` Peter Chubb
2008-08-21 21:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-20 14:35 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-21 21:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-21 21:54 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 0:39 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 1:11 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 16:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 10:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-22 10:55 ` Boris Petkov
2008-08-22 16:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 17:29 ` Boris Petkov
2008-08-22 18:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-22 18:51 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 19:39 ` Robin Holt
2008-08-22 20:36 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 20:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 21:38 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2008-08-22 21:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-08-22 23:02 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-22 23:30 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-22 23:33 ` James Bottomley
2008-08-22 21:15 ` James Bottomley
2008-08-25 16:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080822214914.GA8609@gollum.tnic \
--to=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox