Re: [patch] ia64: Order of operations bug in PT_LOAD segment reader

Simon Horman
2008-10-08T22:09:23Z

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:56:49AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> writes:
>
> > The bug comes about because the break statment was never executed because
> > the if clause would bever be true because the if clause will never be true
> > because & has higher precedence than !=.
> ^^^^^^
> lower

Thanks.

--
Simon Horman
VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en