From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:35:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error
Message-Id: <20090115093514.f3f6b8ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20090115200315.EBE3.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090115200315.EBE3.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:05:08 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Applied after: linux-next.patch
> =
> Subject: [PATCH] remove duplicate EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> Impact: fix build error
> 
> In past, ia64_ksyms.c had EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page) in wrong place.
> 
> old code was
> 
> 	#include <asm/uaccess.h>
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user);
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__do_clear_user);
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__strlen_user);
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__strncpy_from_user);
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(__strnlen_user);
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page);
> 
> (but actually, copy_page is declared in asm/page.h)
> 
> And recently, commit bdc2619ab95d45d434c16d5c216bc6243761f6fb insert
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page) into correct place.
> 
> then, duplicate EXPORT_SYMBOL create following build error.
> 
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:65: error: redefinition of '__kcrctab_copy_page'
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:43: error: previous definition of '__kcrctab_copy_page' was here
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:65: error: redefinition of '__kstrtab_copy_page'
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:43: error: previous definition of '__kstrtab_copy_page' was here
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:65: error: redefinition of '__ksymtab_copy_page'
> arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c:43: error: previous definition of '__ksymtab_copy_page' was here

Yes, this is a strange bug added by

commit 7aed50e09223e7623c7ab826efd53f097bed2f73
Author:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Jan 10 02:25:44 2009 +0000
Commit:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Sat Jan 10 02:25:44 2009 +0000

    CacheFiles: Add missing copy_page export for ia64

I don't see how it could have been tested :(

I also don't know which linux-next tree added that commit.  There's a
way of working this out but I forgot it.