From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Holt Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:55:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] zone_reclaim is always 0 by default Message-Id: <20090609095507.GA9851@attica.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20090604192236.9761.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090608115048.GA15070@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20090608115048.GA15070@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mel Gorman Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , Robin Holt , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Wu Fengguang , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:50:48PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: Let me start by saying I agree completely with everything you wrote and still disagree with this patch, but was willing to compromise and work around this for our upcoming x86_64 machine by putting a "value add" into our packaging of adding a sysctl that turns reclaim back on. ... > > Index: b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h > > =================================> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h > > @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ struct device_node; > > > > #include > > > > +/* > > + * Distance above which we begin to use zone reclaim > > + */ > > +#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 20 > > + > > + > > Where is the ia-64-specific modifier to RECAIM_DISTANCE? It was already defined as 15 in arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h Thanks, Robin