public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan@in.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, bernhard.walle@gmx.de,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 6/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:57:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090824144542.GB11956@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251121443.10645.56.camel@concordia>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:44:03PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 02:55 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> > Introduce a new config option KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE for powerpc.
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > =================================> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > @@ -346,6 +346,17 @@ config KEXEC
> >  	  support.  As of this writing the exact hardware interface is
> >  	  strongly in flux, so no good recommendation can be made.
> >  
> > +config KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE
> > +	bool "automatically reserve memory for kexec kernel"
> > +	depends on KEXEC
> > +	default y
> > +	---help---
> > +	  Automatically reserve memory for a kexec kernel, so that you don't
> > +	  need to specify numbers for the "crashkernel=X@Y" boot option,
> > +	  instead you can use "crashkernel=auto". To make this work, you need
> > +	  to have more than 4G memory. On PPC, 256M is reserved, 1/32 memory
> > +	  on PPC64, but it will not exceed 1T/32.
> 
> That aside, I don't see how this will be useful in practice, if it only
> works for memory sizes over 4G? Or are we saying that people with less
> than 4G don't need crash kernels? If we're not saying that, those users,
> or those users' distros, still need to do some logic to work out if they
> have < 4GB of memory and if so pick a crash kernel size. So why can't
> they pick the size in the > 4GB case also?

True, I wanted to test the patch and when tested on a ppc64 machine which
has RAM less than 4GB, I have to modify arch_default_crash_size routine to
return 256MB (I didn't have a PPC64 machine with more than 4GB RAM handy).
So its better to consider machines with less than 4GB RAM also.

PPC64 crashkernel base is always 32MB. So at least ppc64 code should have
its own arch_default_crash_base to return 32MB to avoid the kernel warning
message "Crash kernel location must be 0x2000000"

Regards,
M. Mohan Kumar

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-24 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-21  6:54 [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:54 ` [Patch 1/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22  0:17   ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-24  1:36     ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22  1:39   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-24  2:02     ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:54 ` [Patch 2/8] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:54 ` [Patch 3/8] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:54 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:55 ` [Patch 5/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22  0:24   ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-22 11:18     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24  2:05       ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24  7:43         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-24  8:21           ` Bernhard Walle
2009-08-24 10:23             ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24  1:59     ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:55 ` [Patch 6/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-24 13:44   ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-24 14:57     ` M. Mohan Kumar [this message]
2009-08-25  6:37       ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-25 10:36         ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-25  6:23     ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-25 10:40       ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-26  6:59         ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:55 ` [Patch 7/8] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-21  6:55 ` [Patch 8/8] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-22  0:06 ` [Patch 0/8] V4 Implement crashkernel=auto Andrew Morton
2009-08-24  1:34   ` Amerigo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090824144542.GB11956@in.ibm.com \
    --to=mohan@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox