From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@novell.com>,
"jirislaby@gmail.com" <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"marcin.slusarz@gmail.com" <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] IA64: use ACCESS_ONCE for rlimits
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:28:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091119022816.GA27729@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911181138120.2261@localhost.localdomain>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> So the rule is: if you access unlocked values, you use ACCESS_ONCE().
> You don't say "but it can't matter". Because you simply don't know.
Most of the time we are being lax about it, especially when it's some
global value we are accessing, which can only be changed as a sysadmin
via a sysctl or so.
[ For example we access pid_max in kernel/pid.c, outside of any lock and
without ACCESS_ONCE() - but that particular case is not a big deal
because changes to pid_max via a sysctl are so rare and are
privileged, and because the effects of any race there are benign. ]
But this patch series is about setrlimit, which makes the per task
rlimit value pretty SMP-volatile (a parallel, unprivileged setrlimit can
race with usage of the value elsewhere) - and the rlimits have security
relevance as well so some extra care in accessing them outside of locks
is prudent IMO.
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4B040A03.2020508@gmail.com>
2009-11-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 03/16] IA64: use ACCESS_ONCE for rlimits Jiri Slaby
2009-11-18 18:56 ` Luck, Tony
2009-11-18 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 2:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091119022816.GA27729@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jslaby@novell.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox