From: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:31:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100827143135.GY18967@zorg.emea.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008271609.16099.ptesarik@suse.cz>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:09 Petr Tesarik wrote:
| On Friday 27 of August 2010 15:48:02 Hedi Berriche wrote:
|
| > One more fact, the problem was introduced by commit
| >
| > commit 9d40ee200a527ce08ab8c793ba8ae3e242edbb0e
| > Author: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
| > Date: Wed Oct 7 10:54:19 2009 -0700
| >
| > [IA64] Squeeze ticket locks back into 4 bytes.
| >
| > Reverting the patch makes the problem go away.
| >
| > IOW, and as far as testing shows, the first incarnation of the ticket locks
| > implementation on IA64 (commit 2c8696), the one that used 8 bytes, does not
| > exhibit this problem.
|
| I wouldn't be so sure about it. Given that I have only observed the problem
| when the spinlock value wraps around, then an 8-byte spinlock might only need
| much more time to trigger the bug.
That's a possibility and that's why I said "as far as testing shows".
That said, I'm letting my already over 36 hours run carry on chewing CPU
time, and see if it will eventually trip the same problem seen with 4-byte
ticket locks.
Cheers,
Hedi.
--
Hedi Berriche
Global Product Support
http://www.sgi.com/support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 13:37 Serious problem with ticket spinlocks on ia64 Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 13:48 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 14:09 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:31 ` Hedi Berriche [this message]
2010-08-27 14:40 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 14:52 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 16:37 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 16:08 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 17:16 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 18:20 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-27 19:40 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 20:29 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 20:41 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 21:03 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 21:11 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 22:13 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-27 23:26 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-27 23:55 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-28 0:28 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-08-28 5:01 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-30 18:17 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-30 21:41 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-08-30 22:43 ` Tony Luck
2010-08-31 22:17 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-01 23:09 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-02 0:26 ` Hedi Berriche
2010-09-03 0:06 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-03 9:04 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:35 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 14:52 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-03 15:50 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-06 14:47 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-07 13:17 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-07 17:35 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-08 15:55 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-10 2:55 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100827143135.GY18967@zorg.emea.sgi.com \
--to=hedi@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox