Linux IA64 platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] generic relative extable support
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:07:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310140702.0c1fd6129a62d10dadd5f3c3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457620996-462-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:43:12 +0700 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:

> This is basically a resend of the remaining relative extable rework patches
> that were queued for v4.6 in Andrew's tree for a couple of weeks, and then
> subsequently dropped due to conflicts with the arm64 and x86 subtrees in -next.
> 
> Since the core patch that these remaining patches depend on is now queued in
> the arm64 tree for inclusion in v4.6, I have rebased this series onto
> next-20160310 so that they may be requeued and hopefully merged late during the
> next merge window. Alternatively, they could be picked up by each maintainer
> separately since they are all independent. Queueing them for v4.7 is likely
> to result in conflicts again, so I think that would be the least preferable
> option.

Yup, these all look good to merge.

> ---- v2 blurb ----
> There are currently four architectures (x86, ia64, alpha and s390) whose
> user-access exception tables are relative to the table entry address rather
> than absolute. Each of these architectures has its own search_extable() and
> sort_extable() implementation, which are not only mostly identical to each
> other, but also deviate very little from the generic absolute implementations
> in lib/extable.c that they override.
> 
> So before making arm64 the fifth architecture that reimplements this, let's
> refactor the existing code so that all of these architectures use common code
> for searching and sorting the relative extables. Archs may set
> ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE to indicate that the table consists of a pair of
> relative ints, and may define swap_ex_entry_fixup() if the fixup member needs
> special treatment in the swapping step of the sorting routine (such as alpha).
> 

I'll want to manually verify that the required patches are upstreamed. 
I assume we're referring to a272858a3c1ecd4a ("extable: add support for
relative extables to search and sort routines") and related patches?


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 14:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] generic relative extable support Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-10 22:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-03-11  0:41   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160310140702.0c1fd6129a62d10dadd5f3c3@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox