From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Trofimovich Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 08:51:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ia64: fix module loading for gcc-5.4 Message-Id: <20170409095121.5f0b6a1e@sf> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Sig_/dBGIy=ldhz8fqkj=tQOYud/" List-Id: References: <20170408195318.18080-1-slyfox@gentoo.org> <79cc2afd-1655-c276-a53f-2e2202a7e0ee@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <79cc2afd-1655-c276-a53f-2e2202a7e0ee@users.sourceforge.net> To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , "H . J . Lu" , Tony Luck --Sig_/dBGIy=ldhz8fqkj=tQOYud/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 10:27:52 +0200 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > That caused ia64 module loader to choke > > on such instructions: > > fuse: invalid slot number 1 for IMM64 =20 >=20 > Why does it matter to check such a value? I'm not sure I follow the question. Is your question about linux kernel relocation code handler, gcc or ia64 instruction format? --=20 Sergei --Sig_/dBGIy=ldhz8fqkj=tQOYud/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: =?unknown-8bit?b?0KbQuNGE0YDQvtCy0LDRjyDQv9C+0LTQv9C40YHRjA==?= OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSZKa0VG5avZRlY01hxoe52YR/zqgUCWOn2CQAKCRBxoe52YR/z qjHKAJ9BqGiKhuAx1dLrbQtB8cl4seQ5EgCdEXnCNWhPRYZqFBCFYbEjsNcOK1c= =mrfJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dBGIy=ldhz8fqkj=tQOYud/--