From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:44:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170918174432.4fksyzco2g6gczwe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170916035347.19705-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:53:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello
>
> RFC
>
> On some arches C function pointers are indirect and point to
> a function descriptor, which contains the actual pointer to the code.
> This mostly doesn't matter, except for cases when people want to print
> out function pointers in symbolic format, because the usual '%pS/%ps'
> does not work on those arches as expected. That's the reason why we
> have '%pF/%pf', but since it's here because of a subtle ABI detail
> specific to some arches (ppc64/ia64/parisc64) it's easy to misuse
> '%pF/%pf' and '%pS/%ps' (see [1], for example).
A few new warnings when building on ia64:
arch/ia64/kernel/module.c:931: warning: passing argument 1 of 'dereference_function_descriptor' makes pointer from integer without a cast
arch/ia64/kernel/module.c:931: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast
kernel/kallsyms.c:325: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast
kernel/kallsyms.c:325: warning: passing argument 1 of 'dereference_kernel_function_descriptor' makes pointer from integer without a cast
Tried out the module case with a simple Hello-world test case.
This code:
char buf[1];
int init_module(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Hello world 1.\n");
printk("using %%p my init_module is at %p\n", init_module);
printk("using %%pF my init_module is at %pF\n", init_module);
printk("using %%pS my init_module is at %pS\n", init_module);
printk("using %%p my buf is at %p\n", buf);
printk("using %%pF my buf is at %pF\n", buf);
printk("using %%pS my buf is at %pS\n", buf);
return 0;
}
Gave this console output:
Hello world 1.
using %p my init_module is at a000000203bf0328
using %pF my init_module is at init_module+0x0/0x140 [hello_1]
using %pS my init_module is at init_module+0x0/0x140 [hello_1]
using %p my buf is at a000000203bf0648
using %pF my buf is at buf+0x0/0xfffffffffffffb58 [hello_1]
using %pS my buf is at buf+0x0/0xfffffffffffffb58 [hello_1]
Which looks like what you wanted. People unaware of the vagaries
of ppc64/ia64/parisc64 can use the wrong %p[SF] variant, but still
get the right output.
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-18 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-16 3:53 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] sections: split dereference_function_descriptor() Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] ia64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 9:55 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-16 11:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 10:22 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-19 10:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 1:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-20 6:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] parisc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-18 17:44 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-09-18 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller
2017-09-19 2:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 13:38 ` David Laight
2017-09-19 20:07 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 8:41 ` David Laight
2017-09-20 10:20 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 16:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 14:07 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-19 20:03 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 0:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-19 2:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170918174432.4fksyzco2g6gczwe@intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox