From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:33:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Message-Id: <20170920163324.GB502@tigerII.localdomain> List-Id: References: <20170920162910.32053-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170920162910.32053-9-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170920162910.32053-9-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley , Helge Deller , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches On (09/21/17 01:29), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart > enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such > dereference is required. > > checkpatch warning example: > > WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF' weird... somehow I sent this patch twice. please ignore this one. -ss