Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] hugetlb: Factorize hugetlb architecture primitives

Alexandre Ghiti
2018-07-27T06:51:51Z

Hi Mike,

Thanks for your review. I'm going to fix the 2nd patch as you said,
you're right, no need to move the #include at the bottom of the file.
I'm going to post a v5, add -mm in cc and ask for inclusion in their tree.

Thanks again for your time,

Alex

On 07/26/2018 09:16 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 07/26/2018 04:46 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 07/20/2018 11:37 AM, Alex Ghiti wrote:
>>>> Does anyone have any suggestion about those patches ?
>>> I only took a quick look. From the hugetlb perspective, I like the
>>> idea of moving routines to a common file. If any of the arch owners
>>> (or anyone else) agree, I can do a review of the series.
>> The conversions look pretty good to me. If you want to give it a review
>> then from my point of view it could go in -mm to shake out any bugs.
> Nothing of significance found in a review. As others have suggested,
> the (cross)compiler may be better at finding issues than human eyes.
>
> I also suggest it be added to -mm.