From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Schnelle Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:53:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: mark syscall number 435 reserved for clone3 Message-Id: <20190716185310.GA12537@t470p.stackframe.org> List-Id: References: <20190714192205.27190-1-christian@brauner.io> <20190714192205.27190-2-christian@brauner.io> <20190716130631.tohj4ub54md25dys@brauner.io> In-Reply-To: <20190716130631.tohj4ub54md25dys@brauner.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vasily Gorbik Hi, [Adding Helge to CC list] On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:06:33PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > I think Vasily already has a clone3 patch for s390x with 435. > > A quick follow-up on this. Helge and Michael have asked whether there > are any tests for clone3. Yes, there will be and I try to have them > ready by the end of the this or next week for review. In the meantime I > hope the following minimalistic test program that just verifies very > very basic functionality (It's not pretty.) will help you test: > [..] On PA-RISC this seems to work fine with Helge's patch to wire up the clone3 syscall. root@c3750:/# clonetest Parent process received child's pid 84 as return value Parent process received child's pidfd 3 Parent process received child's pid 84 as return argument Child process with pid 84 root@c3750:/# echo $? 0 Regards Sven