From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:39:43 +0000 Subject: Re: cleanup swiotlb initialization Message-Id: <20220224163943.GA32088@lst.de> List-Id: References: <20220222153514.593231-1-hch@lst.de> <09cb4ad3-88e7-3744-b4b8-a6d745ecea9e@oracle.com> <20220224155854.GA30938@lst.de> <206ba6a3-770a-70ad-96bc-76c6380da988@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <206ba6a3-770a-70ad-96bc-76c6380da988@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Christoph Hellwig , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , Juergen Gross , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Lu Baolu , Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:18:33AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > On 2/24/22 10:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> This looks really strange as early_amd_iommu_init should not interact much >> with the changes. I'll see if I can find a AMD system to test on. > > > Just to be clear: this crashes only as dom0. Boots fine as baremetal. Ah. I can gues what this might be. On Xen the hypervisor controls the IOMMU and we should never end up initializing it in Linux, right?