From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:59:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb Message-Id: <20220303105931.GA15137@lst.de> List-Id: References: <20220301105311.885699-1-hch@lst.de> <20220301105311.885699-12-hch@lst.de> <20220302081500.GB23075@lst.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Christoph Hellwig , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, Anshuman Khandual , Tom Lendacky , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Lu Baolu , Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:25:10PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Thinking more about it we actually need to drop the xen_initial_domain() > check otherwise some cases won't be functional (Dom0 not 1:1 mapped, or > DomU 1:1 mapped). Hmm, but that would be the case even before this series, right?