From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 05:35:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] compiler: inline does not imply notrace Message-Id: <20230526013534.76e5b613@rorschach.local.home> List-Id: References: <20230525210040.3637-1-namit@vmware.com> <20230525210040.3637-3-namit@vmware.com> <20230525222844.6a0d84f8@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Nadav Amit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Linux-Arch , linux-mm , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , X86 ML , Peter Zijlstra On Thu, 25 May 2023 22:17:33 -0700 Nadav Amit wrote: > > FYI, I have a patch queued (still needs to go through testing) that > > already does this ;-) > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230502164102.1a51cdb4@gandalf.local.home/ > > Ugh. If you cc’d me, I wouldn’t bother you during your vacation. :) I'm currently passed the vacation part and now in Taiwan for work. > > I think you may like the first patch in my series to precede this patch > though as some of the function I marked as “notrace" are currently “inline”. > > Let me know how you want to proceed, so I would know how to break this > series. Currently there's a nasty bug in v6.4-rc3 I'm fighting where I can't proceed on anything until it's resolved. But I could also just pull your first and third patch too. I'll let you know when I'm finished debugging. -- Steve