From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:09:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: simplify hugetlb handling in follow_page_mask Message-Id: <362e6361-e2b7-16eb-83c8-203738f7b5d0@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20220829234053.159158-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <608934d4-466d-975e-6458-34a91ccb4669@redhat.com> <739dc825-ece3-a59f-adc5-65861676e0ae@redhat.com> <323fdb0f-c5a5-e0e5-1ff4-ab971bc295cc@redhat.com> <5f6a7c6b-5073-f050-8dae-6ee279a8bb0b@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christophe Leroy , Mike Kravetz Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Baolin Wang , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Naoya Horiguchi , Michael Ellerman , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" > Yes I think the assumption is correct for user pages hence for GUP. > > By the way the discussion started with PTDUMP. For PTDUMP we need huge > page directories to be taken into account. And for anything that > involves kernel pages like VMAP or VMALLOC. Yes, makes perfect sense to me now that you explained how/where hugepd is actually used -- thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb