From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luming Yu" Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:44:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] set TASK_TRACED before arch_ptrace code to fix a race Message-Id: <3877989d0809172244h196c79d6k67a9a024221b104a@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <3877989d0805211947i54bacc7cv619541e9b40824fb@mail.gmail.com> <3877989d0806031916wf11bb2t3847aa630fb39e60@mail.gmail.com> <48465D5C.8000804@suse.cz> <3877989d0806041849vb903aaw221de929e2ab8cb9@mail.gmail.com> <1212664605.15747.16.camel@elijah.suse.cz> <20080627204954.34F8B154231@magilla.localdomain> <3877989d0809082006v496bae4i1c0736f5d55e9b9f@mail.gmail.com> <20080910055504.9A2A41541FE@magilla.localdomain> <3877989d0809160150y385edd59i231aca8b1073ce14@mail.gmail.com> <20080917170122.7797E640A5@pipsqueak.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080917170122.7797E640A5@pipsqueak.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Roland McGrath Cc: Petr Tesarik , LKML , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org The another mysterious that I completely don't understand probably needs your help. Why kernels with utrace patch applied on ia64 just work? Sounds like utrace delivers an extra SIGTRAP comparing with kernel without utrace code.. Dose it make sense? Hmm.. Sounds like a bug to me.. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: > So is there or is there not any regression (change) in the kernel's behavior? > > If you are now just talking about strace's own code, then the place for > that is strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, not any kernel lists. > > > Thanks, > Roland >