From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 15:31:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Remove Intel compiler support Message-Id: <3b5bfa95-ff64-0e8b-44a3-8b67b767ffd6@intel.com> List-Id: References: <20221011031843.960217-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20221011031843.960217-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Masahiro Yamada , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Miguel Ojeda , Len Brown , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Terrell , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Robert Moore , Tom Rix , devel@acpica.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev On 10/10/22 20:18, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > I am sending this to Linus and the x86 maintainers with RFC. > If somebody is still using ICC, please speak up! Yeah, the bit rot is not a good sign. I honestly can't remember seeing anyone actually use icc during my entire tenure at Intel. I'll ask around to see if there's any plausible reason to fix this up and keep it. But, I'm not holding my breath.