From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zoltan Menyhart Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:09:34 +0000 Subject: Re: Yet another MCA handler Message-Id: <400658CE.23F6D0B4@nospam.org> List-Id: References: <40051D1B.7912DB91@nospam.org> In-Reply-To: <40051D1B.7912DB91@nospam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Russ Anderson wrote: > > Zoltan Menyhart wrote: > > > > I was to write the code for the recovery for poisoned memory, too, > > but I've got no way to provoke this kind of error > > ( I do not really know what it like is :-) ) > > If you get that far, take the Intel Itanium 2 Processor > Specification Update (December 2003) errata 78 into account > > 78. L2 cache line with poison data results in unexpected fatal MCA > > http://www.intel.com/design/itanium2/specupdt/251141.htm Thanks for the hint, but as far as I can see, it's not what I look for. This is a fatal MCA. I need something classified as recoverable (byte 10: ERR_SEVERITY in the SAL log record header). Zoltan Menyhart