From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Kegel Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:50:18 +0000 Subject: Re: gcc problems Message-Id: <4023C5CA.3010405@kegel.com> List-Id: References: <20040206000058.7e928d80.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040206000058.7e928d80.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >>The fields were named differently in old versions of glibc, but the whole >> layout didn't change in any way. >> >> - unsigned long int sc_rsvd[16];/* reserved for future use */ >> + unsigned long int sc_rbs_base;/* NULL or new base of sighandler's rbs */ >> + unsigned long int sc_loadrs; /* see description above */ >> + unsigned long int sc_ar25; /* cmp8xchg16 uses this */ >> + unsigned long int sc_ar26; /* rsvd for scratch use */ >> + unsigned long int sc_rsvd[12];/* reserved for future use */ >> >> > The easiest workaround is probably to install libunwind on your system >> >> The right fix is not to use a 2 years old glibc. > > > That's not very old. One shouldn't have to upgrade libc just to build gcc? Did the two-year-old libc really support ia64 well? I guess Itanium 1 was out then, but those were early days... - Dan