From: Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: UCE and NUMA
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:40:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40576628.927DEB35@email.mot.com> (raw)
Hi,
we're currently evaluating a NUMA system (8-way). We're
wondering for hot contention spots does the 2.4 or 2.6 kernel
make use of IA64 UCE Memory attribute (fetchadd)?
Has anyone been able to catpure relative performance
differences (WB vs. UCE) for any benchmark ?
- Mario
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-16 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 20:40 Mario Smarduch [this message]
2004-03-17 16:57 ` UCE and NUMA Mario Smarduch
2004-03-17 18:54 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40576628.927DEB35@email.mot.com \
--to=cms063@email.mot.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox