public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Wellenreiter <Francois.Wellenreiter@Ext.Bull.Net>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Abnormal behaviour towards "INIT" interrupt management
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:02:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40691B80.9070309@Ext.Bull.Net> (raw)


			Hi,

	I've already sent this mail, but receiving no feedback, I try again 
(sorry for people who don't feel concerned by that stuff).
I'd like to report what I estimate a potential bug in the INIT 
management (at the present time I don't know exactly what the origin of 
this problem is).

Testing the "dump" button on a 4-way Itanium-2 machine equipped with a 
SAL 3.0, I've noticed a not-inline with SAL specifications behaviour.
Indeed, in the "ia64_mca_init" function (in arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c file)
we register the functions "ia64_monarch_init_handler" and 
"ia64_slave_init_handler".

Then I push on the "dump" button that generates an INIT interruption to 
all the processors. This signal is then caught by PAL, and SAL which 
calls (with a reason [register GR11] equal to 2) 
"ia64_monarch_init_handler" on the monarch processor and 
"ia64_slave_init_handler" on the slave ones (to this point, I hope to be 
right, isn't it ?).
What I've noticed using traces (and further an ITP tool) is that for 
each processor the "ia64_monarch_init_handler" is ever called. :-(
Could someone tell me if he already has encountered this problem or if 
it is an expected behavior ?

For information, I've done the same test with a 16-way Itanium-2 machine
with a SAL 3.1 and the result is exactly the same.

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,

			Francois WELLENREITER


             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-30  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-30  7:02 Francois Wellenreiter [this message]
2004-03-30 15:19 ` Abnormal behaviour towards "INIT" interrupt management Bjorn Helgaas
2004-03-30 18:52 ` Luck, Tony
2004-03-31  6:37 ` Francois Wellenreiter
2004-03-31  6:43 ` Francois Wellenreiter
2004-03-31 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-04-01  3:23 ` Jim Garlick
2004-04-01  6:26 ` Francois Wellenreiter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40691B80.9070309@Ext.Bull.Net \
    --to=francois.wellenreiter@ext.bull.net \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox