From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:31:35 +0000 Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch V12 [0/7]: Overview and performance Message-Id: <41AEC4D7.4060507@pobox.com> List-Id: References: <41AEB44D.2040805@pobox.com><20041201223441.3820fbc0.akpm@osdl.org><41AEBAB9.3050705@pobox.com> <20041201230217.1d2071a8.akpm@osdl.org> <179540000.1101972418@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <179540000.1101972418@[10.10.2.4]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, clameter@sgi.com, hugh@veritas.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Yeah, probably. Though the stress tests catch a lot more than the > functionality ones. The big pain in the ass is drivers, because I don't > have a hope in hell of testing more than 1% of them. My dream is that hardware vendors rotate their current machines through a test shop :) It would be nice to make sure that the popular drivers get daily test coverage. Jeff, dreaming on