From: Monica Correa <mcorrea@inf.pucrs.br>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: ia64 sched-domains initialisation]
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:10:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4297546D.6040807@inf.pucrs.br> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1899 bytes --]
Hi Jesse and Xavier,
Since last February we have implemented a patch for Linux that
considers the number of levels a NUMA computer has. We build the sched
domains based on the number of levels, which we extract from the SLIT
table. We have tested our code on a HP Superdome computer, and we are
willing to share it with someone that would try it. We didn't share it
before because we could not test our patch in a bigger machine. The
machine we have access to is a 1 NUMA level.
Further, we modelled our strategy using analytical models and
simulation and the results we got are promissing. You can find our patch
and copies of two papers that describe our strategy in the following
address: http://www.inf.pucrs.br/~peso/loadBalancerEng.htm. We are
preparing a paper on the simulation results we got (if you would like to
get a copy of the unfinished version of this paper, we can send it
directly to you).
It would be nice if you could give us some feedback on our approach.
Monica Correa
Jesse Barnes wrote:
>On Friday, May 27, 2005 8:57 am, Xavier Bru wrote:
>
>
>>An other alternative is using the node_distance() that comes from the
>>SLIT to build the sched domains instead of using
>>SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN on the platform.
>>
>>
>
>This option seems like the way to go. The size is far from optimally
>tuned as well, benchmarking is needed (unless we want boot time
>heuristics to determine the sched domain layout).
>
>
>
>>The following patch sets SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN as a config/boot
>>parameter, and when the value is 0 uses the node_distance to build
>>the sched domains.
>>
>>
>
>Maybe you could make that the default behavior?
>
>Jesse
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3182 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2005-05-27 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4297546D.6040807@inf.pucrs.br \
--to=mcorrea@inf.pucrs.br \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox