From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:01:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] SN2 user-MMIO CPU migration Message-Id: <43DA27B6.8050502@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20060118163305.Y42462@chenjesu.americas.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060118163305.Y42462@chenjesu.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > > 80-column religious sometime is just pure annoying. I personally find > this looked worse than having the lines spilled over 80 column, in these > two particular instances. > > - Ken Ken, I understand your concern, however, Documentation/CodingStyle is explicit about this -- do not exceed 80 columns. The problem here really is that the code already exceeds 80 columns and we're (in a sense) breaking it even further by continuing to exceed 80 columns. P.