From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 10:52:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: IA64 ISOs based on Fedora Core 5 Message-Id: <4433A171.4050200@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <44332325.8050207@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <44332325.8050207@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Paul Nasrat wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 21:53 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>A set of CD ISOs and a DVD ISO based on the March 20, 2006 image of the >>ia64 Fedora development branch (also known as rawhide) are available from >> >> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fedora > > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fedora-ia64/download - 404 Yep, that doesn't exist. 'fedora', not 'fedora-ia64' > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fedora/download/ - 403 > Odd .. that seems to work for me (off of my home connection). I'll check into it ... > > > > I assume for the weekly snapshots of rawhide that you'll be putting > unique (eg date based) names on the isos so they can be readily > identified, else you're going to run into trouble tracking issues across > media sets. Do these isos correspond with FC5 or a random snapshot? > My plan was to take a weekly snapshot of rawhide and give it a date-based name to avoid the problem(s) you bring up. P.