From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Hildner Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:15:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] LVHPT - Setup LVHPT Message-Id: <445890B8.9050506@hob.de> List-Id: References: <20060502052557.8990.87273.sendpatchset@wagner.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> In-Reply-To: <20060502052557.8990.87273.sendpatchset@wagner.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Ian Wienand schrieb: >On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Christian Hildner wrote: > > >>Yes. So why not picking up Ken's idea of two parallel IVTs. >> >> > >I have a version of this, which I've tried to post here but I think >the size limit here is very low. It made it through to linux-mm > >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m4664224732618&w=2 > >or the patches are at > >http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~ianw/lvhpt/patches/v2 > >It generates ivt.S using a little script. Any feedback on this >approach welcome. > Ian, I suggested a solution without having any script at all instead working with something like ivt.h containing macros for all common code and ivt_svhpt.S and ivt_lvhpt.S in parallel for specific code. It just might be more readable than your approach and both ways would be treated equal by the make process. Technically they are the same. Christian