From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kirill Korotaev Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:24:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Linux 2.6.17.11 - fix compilation error on IA64 Message-Id: <44F431F5.7020703@sw.ru> List-Id: References: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A72869D@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> <20060829013137.GA27869@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20060829013137.GA27869@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Greg KH Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Fernando Vazquez , gregkh@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, dev@openvz.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, stable@kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, xemul@openvz.org Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 03:11:31PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > >>>The commit 8833ebaa3f4325820fe3338ccf6fae04f6669254 introduced a change that broke >>>IA64 compilation as shown below: >> >>What happened to the mainline version of the patch to which this >>is a fix (local DoS with corrupted ELFs)? I don't see it in 2.6.18-rc5. >>Did it get fixed some other way, or is it just queued somewhere? Or do >>we have a fix in -stable that isn't in mainline? > > > I thought this was a fix for a prior -stable patch that did not affect > mainline. Or was this thought wrong? it should be passed to Linus. Probably it is my fault, since I thought that patches which got into -stable automatically go into Linus tree. Thanks, Kirill