From: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ia64: What the stack trace of a slave cpu kdump should save?
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:39:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <454A9DD6.6040606@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <454A3D93.8090006@sgi.com>
Zou, Nanhai wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jay Lan
>> Sent: 2006Äê11ÔÂ3ÈÕ 2:49
>> To: fastboot; Linux-IA64
>> Subject: ia64: What the stack trace of a slave cpu kdump should save?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a vmcore created by NMI on an SN. The gdb backtrace
>> showed the slave cpu as below:
>>
>> # gdb vmlinux vmcore-nmi-10
>> GNU gdb 6.4
>> Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
>> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>> conditions.
>> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
>> This GDB was configured as "ia64-suse-linux"...Using host libthread_db
>> library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
>>
>> #0 crash_save_this_cpu () at arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c:57
>>
>> warning: Source file is more recent than executable.
>> 57 memcpy(buf, name, note->n_namesz);
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 crash_save_this_cpu () at arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c:57
>> #1 0xa00000010005f580 in kdump_cpu_freeze (info=<value optimized out>,
>> arg=0x1) at arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c:166
>> #2 0xa00000010000c9f0 in unw_init_running () at include/linux/bitmap.h:237
>> #3 0xa00000010005ef70 in kdump_init_notifier (self=0xa000000100b47d78,
>> val=<value optimized out>, data=0xe000003007157b70)
>> at arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c:217
>> #4 0xa0000001000cf0d0 in notifier_call_chain (nl=0xe000003014bcb3f8,
>> val\x13,
>> v=0xe000003007157b70) at kernel/sys.c:144
>> #5 0xa0000001000cf170 in atomic_notifier_call_chain
>> (nh=0xe000003014bcb3f0,
>> val!, v=0xe000003007157b70) at kernel/sys.c:229
>> #6 0xa000000100048480 in ia64_init_handler (regs=0xe000003007157e40,
>> sw=<value optimized out>, sos=<value optimized out>)
>> at include/asm/kdebug.h:88
>> #7 0xa0000001000493a0 in ia64_os_init_virtual_begin ()
>> at include/asm/kdebug.h:88
>> (gdb)
>>
>> It is the stack _after_ NMI is triggered. Is this supposed to be?
>> What do you see on other (ie not SN) ia64 platforms?
>>
> Yes, this is the stack on all other platforms..,
>
> You may call it INIT instead of NMI because NMI is another kind of interrupt that can be masked by psr.i...
> Kdump construct an additional switch stack frame on top of current stack thus crash tool can do its unwind from that.
> Kdump also capture ip, sp, bsp and other register related to current stack frame to help gdb to unwind the stack.
> What you see is the stack of INIT , you may use crash tools to back trace stack of other process.
Yes, the crash tools Dave released today (4.0-3.9) showed the stacks
nicely. Thanks for your explanation, Nanhai.
- jay
> However INIT can break CPU in any context include PROM code, so it is not possible to back trace the stack of INIT happening..
>
> Thanks
> Zou Nan hai
> -
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-03 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-02 18:48 ia64: What the stack trace of a slave cpu kdump should save? Jay Lan
2006-11-03 0:44 ` Zou, Nanhai
2006-11-03 1:39 ` Jay Lan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=454A9DD6.6040606@sgi.com \
--to=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox