From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Cohen Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:39:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [perfmon] 2.6.19 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon Message-Id: <45773883.5040003@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20061204164644.GO31914@frankl.hpl.hp.com> <4575AB54.2050509@redhat.com> <20061205222810.GA6385@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20061205222810.GA6385@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: eranian@hpl.hp.com, perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:24:36PM -0500, William Cohen wrote: > >>Some of the ptrace functions (e.g. ptrace_may_attach in perfmon_syscall.c) >>being used in the perfmon kernel patches will go away with the utrace >>patches: http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace/ > > > At least for ptrace_may_attach that's not true in the lastest version > from Roland - in fact it's the last unconditional function in ptrace.c > in that version. I suggested to him to rename and move it in my review, > though. > Sorry. I meant the function ptrace_check_attach(). -Will