From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Knutsson Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:57:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] is_power_of_2 in ia64mm Message-Id: <45D5D47F.3000303@student.ltu.se> List-Id: References: <1171627435.6127.0.camel@wriver-t81fb058.linuxcoe> <45D5C789.1090607@student.ltu.se> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Vignesh Babu BM , Kernel Janitors List , linux-mm@kvack.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Schwab wrote: > Richard Knutsson writes: > > >> Vignesh Babu BM wrote: >> >>> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_setup_sz(char *str) >>> tr_pages = 0x15557000UL; >>> size = memparse(str, &str); >>> - if (*str || (size & (size-1)) || !(tr_pages & size) || >>> + if (*str || !is_power_of_2(size) || !(tr_pages & size) || >>> size <= PAGE_SIZE || >>> size >= (1UL << PAGE_SHIFT << MAX_ORDER)) { >>> printk(KERN_WARNING "Invalid huge page size specified\n"); >>> >>> >>> >> As we talked about before; is this really correct? !is_power_of_2(0) = >> true while (0 & (0-1)) = 0. >> > > size = 0 is also covered by the next two conditions, so the overall value > does not change. > Yes, but is it meant to state that 'size' is not a power of two? Otherwise, imho, it should be left as-is. Richard Knutsson