From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH take2 0/13] Support vector domain on ia64
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:14:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <468B10A3.8030209@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46779036.5050602@jp.fujitsu.com>
Luck, Tony wrote:
>> include/asm/hardirq.h:30:3: #error HARDIRQ_BITS is too low!
>
> This one is a direct consequence of the new definition of NR_IRQS:
>
> #define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + 32 * NR_CPUS))
>
> With a large NR_CPUS value, this gets too big. Do we really need to scale
> it with the number of cpus? I don't think this is the right thing to do.
> While large cpu count systems may also have a large number of I/O devices,
> the two parameters aren't strongly connected.
>
> We could prevent it blowing up by doing:
>
> /* NR_IRQS is limited by HARDIRQ_BITS */
> #if (NR_VECTORS + 32 * NR_CPUS)) < 16363
> #define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + 32 * NR_CPUS))
> #else
> #define NR_IRQS 16383
> #endif
I think if the number of CPUs is small, the value of NR_IRQS depends
on the value of NR_CPUS. But, if the number of CPUs is large, this
relation becomes weak. Because, in general machine composition, the
number of I/O devices doesn't increase proportionally even if the
number of CPUs increases. So, this threshold such as 16383 is too
large. I'd like to define NR_IRQS as follows.
#if (NR_VECTORS + 32 * NR_CPUS)) < 1024
#define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + 32 * NR_CPUS))
#else
#define NR_IRQS 1024
#endif
And, I will make NR_IRQS a tunable parameter which user can define as
boot parameter.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> But that looks rather ugly and still fails to build because of overflow of the percpu area.
> This gets big because of include/linux/kernel_stat.h:
>
> DECLARE_PERCPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
>
> With the current allocation of percpu stuff, it looks like we can push NR_IRQS up
> to around 7.5K, but that would leave no space for other additions to percpu space.
> So if large systems are going to need as many as 7.5K IRQs, then we'll also need to
> do something about kstat.
>
> -Tony
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-04 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 8:13 [RFC][PATCH take2 0/13] Support vector domain on ia64 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-06-29 21:04 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-29 22:30 ` Luck, Tony
2007-06-29 23:20 ` Luck, Tony
2007-07-02 10:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-07-04 3:14 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2007-07-05 11:55 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2007-07-10 18:12 ` Luck, Tony
2007-07-10 23:36 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=468B10A3.8030209@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox