From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hidetoshi Seto Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:55:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ia64 clocksource Message-Id: <469CA033.6080506@jp.fujitsu.com> List-Id: References: <20070714002509.GJ2317@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070714002509.GJ2317@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Bob Picco wrote: > @@ -214,61 +209,56 @@ ENTRY(fsys_gettimeofday) : > movl r27 = xtime : > .time_redo: > - .pred.rel.mutex p8,p9,p10 > - ld4.acq r28 = [r29] // xtime_lock.sequence. Must come first for locking purposes > + ld4.acq r28 = [r20] // gtod_lock.sequence, Must be first in struct : > ld8 r8 = [r27],-IA64_TIMESPEC_TV_NSEC_OFFSET // xtime.tv_nsec : > - ld4 r10 = [r29] // xtime_lock.sequence > + ld4 r10 = [r20] // gtod_lock.sequence, old xtime_lock.sequence : > cmp4.ne.or p7,p0 = r28,r10 > -(p7) br.cond.dpnt.few .time_redo // sequence number changed ? > +(p7) br.cond.dpnt.few .time_redo // sequence number changed, outer loop2 This patch removes locking xtime_lock but the code still reads xtime. Since gtod_lock.sequence will not tell us whether xtime is updated (or going to be updated) while in this window, the result may be wrong... > // r29 = address of seqlock : > - movl r20 = time_interpolator > + movl r20 = fsyscall_gtod_data // load fsyscall gettimeofday data address > ;; > - ld8 r20 = [r20] // get pointer to time_interpolator structure > - movl r29 = xtime_lock > - ld4 r2 = [r2] // process work pending flags > + add r29 = IA64_ITC_JITTER_OFFSET,r20 It seems that the comment doesn't match to current usage. Thanks, H.Seto