From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ia64: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (accurate cpu time accounting)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:37:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4714BEAA.5050008@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
> [4/9] ia64_self_update_process_times.patch
Next, we need to stop sampling in timer interrupt which
used for tick-based cpu time accounting.
Now the stime/utime of threads are updated in a function
update_process_times(), that is called from timer_interrupt().
[arch/ia64/kernel/time.c]
46 static irqreturn_t
47 timer_interrupt (int irq, void *dev_id)
48 {
:
65 while (1) {
66 update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
:
70 if (smp_processor_id() = time_keeper_id) {
:
78 do_timer(1);
:
84 if (time_after(new_itm, ia64_get_itc()))
85 break;
:
92 }
This update_process_times() is defined in kernel/timer.c.
Therefore, I copied this function into ia64 region to ready to
modify it as we like.
This patch just do copy. Later change will be done.
Thanks,
H.Seto
Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/ia64/kernel/time.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
=================================--- linux-2.6.23.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
+++ linux-2.6.23/arch/ia64/kernel/time.c
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
+#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
+#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
+
/*
* Account time for a transition between system, hard irq
* or soft irq state.
@@ -70,6 +73,31 @@
}
+/*
+ * Called from the timer interrupt handler to charge one tick to the current
+ * process. user_tick is 1 if the tick is user time, 0 for system.
+ */
+static inline void ia64_update_process_times(int user_tick)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = current;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ /* Note: this timer irq context must be accounted for as well. */
+ if (user_tick)
+ account_user_time(p, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
+ else
+ account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, jiffies_to_cputime(1));
+ run_local_timers();
+ if (rcu_pending(cpu))
+ rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
+ scheduler_tick();
+ run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
+
+#define ia64_update_process_times(utick) update_process_times(utick)
+
#endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
static irqreturn_t
@@ -92,7 +120,7 @@
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
while (1) {
- update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
+ ia64_update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
new_itm += local_cpu_data->itm_delta;
reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4714BEAA.5050008@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox