From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:32:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH with title] priority fix in acpi_map_lsapic() arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c Message-Id: <473CC907.4040106@tiscali.nl> List-Id: References: <473CC232.6020901@tiscali.nl> In-Reply-To: <473CC232.6020901@tiscali.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: tony.luck@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org As above should have been its title. Roel Kluin wrote: > I have sent this patch before to lkml, but it appears it wasn't picked up. Also > I have to admit this isn't tested. This is a patch against linus' tree. > > ACPI_MADT_ENABLED is defined 1 (include/acpi/actbl1.h 501) > lapic_flags: an u32 of struct acpi_madt_local_sapic (include/acpi/actbl1.h 467) > -- > '!' has a higher priority than '&', so as was > this won't test the first bit, but rather evaluates to false for any non-zero > lsapic->lapic_flags. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> > --- > diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c > index 3d45d24..7d78d22 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ int acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int *pcpu) > lsapic = (struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *)obj->buffer.pointer; > > if ((lsapic->header.type != ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_SAPIC) || > - (!lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) { > + (!(lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))) { > kfree(buffer.pointer); > return -EINVAL; > } >