From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:35:03 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Xen arch portability patches
Message-Id: <47BDD267.9010706@goop.org>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20080221084530.470680000@ls.local.valinux.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20080221084530.470680000@ls.local.valinux.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: yamahata@valinux.co.jp
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>

yamahata@valinux.co.jp wrote:
> Hi. Recently the xen-ia64 community started to make efforts to merge 
> xen/ia64 Linux to upstream. The first step is to merge up domU portion.
> This patchset is preliminary for xen/ia64 domU linux making the current
> xen/x86 domU code more arch generic and adding missing definitions and
> files.
>   

I haven't looked at the whole series yet, but this seems fine in 
principle.  One thing: using attachments to post makes it hard to do 
inline comments on the patches.

    J